分站:劳动法 婚姻法 债权债务 房地产 交通法 公司法 合同法 证券法 税法 刑事辩护 买房指南 涉外法律 律师加盟 法律咨询 联系我们
上海法律网

专题
频道

法治动态 | 理论研究 | 疑难实务 | 经典案例 | 法律法规 | 上海法规 | 法律图书 | 合同文本 | 海事海商
房产律师 | 婚姻律师 | 劳动律师 | 公司律师 | 合同律师 | 交通医疗 | 刑事行政 | 保险证券 | 知识产权
 
·上海律师免费加盟本站的公告
·本站招募法律专家顾问的公告
·本站招募区县独家合作律师
·知识产权律师 13621792142
 您现在的位置: 上海法律网 >> 涉外法律 >> 涉外诉讼仲裁 >> 正文

Your contract should always have teeth

上海法律网 www.sh148.org 来源:本站原创 点击进入:法律咨询热线

Recently a businessman from United States called me inquiring about a dispute between his company (“ACO”) and a Chinese company (“CCO”) manufacturing air bags based in Shanghai. After reviewing the contract between the two companies, I feel quite sorry for ACO.


The story goes like this: the ACO entered into a three-page contract with CCO under which ACO helped CCO to develop the North American market for CCO’s products. Initially, they set a term of three years in the contract and later extended for another year. After years of efforts, when ACO saw the dawn of success of soliciting orders for CCO, the cooperation failed due to CCO’s breach of contract by not upgrading their production lines to meet OEM clients’ requirements, as agreed in the Contract. ACO’s commission, calculated at certain percentage of sale volume, is gone for good. Now, ACO is left with only lawsuit to recover his losses. Chinese laws are the governing laws for the contract as provided therein and CIETAC is the arbitration institution they submit to.


Let us put aside the merits of the case. I was actually surprised to find that the contract between the parties were so poorly drafted that ACO was definitely put in a disfavored position. In particular, absent are those default liabilities we have always seen in international business contracts.


Given the nature of transaction under that contract and the long term of contract, ACO is the party that will spend time, money and other costs most of the time in and for persuading North American automakers to visit CCO’s plants, assess their quality control process etc., it is important for ACO to bind CCO to the performance of the contract until success. Otherwise, ACO will be exposed to great losses if CCO withdraws half way, as happened now. To achieve that, it will require the contract to set out every possible scenario that matters to both parties and accordingly specify breach liabilities (liquidated damages or other methods of computing losses) in regard of each and any breach of contract that are likely and easy for courts to enforce. In the business world, this is probably only possible way to avoid and minimize risk exposure.


Bear in mind, a contract without default liabilities clauses is a tiger without teeth.


International businessmen shall be particularly cautious in that regard when dealing with Chinese counterparts. In Chinese culture, people have the custom of not bringing up down sides of a thing and generally like having ambiguous and elusive clauses in contract, which may be troublesome to all parties to that contract.

编辑:China La…
田杰——上海律师,专业从事外商投资、房地产和劳动等业务;
Jason Tian, a Chinese lawyer based in Shanghai, your business partner in China;
Tel: +86-13816548421, Email: doroto@163.com
  • 上一篇文章:

  • 下一篇文章:
  •  

    律师加盟 | 广告合作 | 网站地图 | 友情链接 | 合作伙伴 | 诚聘英才 | 法律声明 | 意见建议 | 联系我们

    声明:本站为公益性网站,非上海律协官方网站,欢迎更多上海律师加盟合作
    上海法律网版权所有 2005-2009© Copyright By SH148.ORG, All rights reserved.
    信息产业部备案号:沪ICP备05003575号